Fig1d results were obtained using a 3-electrode configuration with IrOx as the counter electrode and saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode. Two Si/GaN photocathodes were compared. Sample #1 (named as S#1) was the as-received sample, and sample #2 (named as S#2) was CA tested for 4 hours under same testing conditions described in Fig.1a. The PEC performance (J-V curve) was recorded for both samples. Then a photodeposition of Pt was performed on both samples, each loading time was set to be 5 minutes, then the J-V curve was recorded to track the changes of the performance. The Pt photodeposition was stopped until the J-V curve won't shift (the maximum onset potential was achieved). The results show that, S#1 needs at least 20 minutes of Pt photodeposition to achieve its best PEC performance while S#2, which is after CA testing, only needs 5 minutes of Pt photodeposition to achieve its best PEC performance.

Dataset Metadata

Author Francesca M. Toma
Maintainer Email fmtoma@lbl.gov
DOI 10.17025/1764133
Institution Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Capability Node LBNL PEC Device In-Situ and Operando Testing
LBNL PEC In-Situ and Operando Nanoscale Characterization
LBNL Probing and Mitigating Corrosion
Technology Type PEC
Data Source Type Lab Experimental
Sample Barcode
Sample Name
Collection Date
Comments
Measurement Types JV
Measurement Type Other None

Additional Info

Author Francesca M. Toma
Updated February 5, 2021, 19:29 (UTC)
Created February 4, 2021, 05:25 (UTC)